Review Nikon D700: measurements
| On this page you will find the results of image quality measurementst carried out using Imatest. Sample images and conclusions of our review are given in our Nikon D700 review.
For a brief description of the test method and explanation of terms, see the FAQ section. |
![]() |
Sensor resolution |
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
The Nikon D700 will, combined with a good lens such as the Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED IF AF-S VR, deliver a jpg file with a resolution of 1100 linewidth / pictureheight (LW/PH). Developing the RAW file in Lightroom, employing no noise reduction and a standard amount of sharpening, yields a much higher sharpness impression and an average resolution of 2300 LW/PH. That's quite an improvement! You can see sample images in our Nikon D700 review demonstrating this in practice visible difference. |
|||||
Dynamic range
|
|||||
Noise |
|||||
|
Comparison of the noise in jpg files with the measured noise in RAW files without noise reduction shows that noise reduction occurs at all ISO settings at the jpg files. At higher ISO settings (from 1600 ISO), the noise of Nikon D700 NEF files is much lower than that of the RAW files from the Canon 5D MK2. In both cases, no form of noise reduction is applied. Even at 2300 ISO, the noise of the Nikon D700 is so low that noise reduction is actually not needed. From experience, we know that if the noise is less than 2.5%, a photo can be printed on A3 + size without the noise to be experienced as disturbing. |
![]() |
||||
|
Below sections of a gray card, photographed at different ISO settings, are shown. As mentioned earlier, we didn't use any form of noise reduction for the RAW files. By applying noise reduction to the RAW files even better results would have been achieved. |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Color accuracy @ daylight |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
We measure the color difference "Delta E94" which, unlike "Delta AB" corresponds with our observation: a twice higher value means twice as big a difference to our eyes. In this image (move your mouse over it for a larger version) you see the measurement data for the color accuracy of the Nikon D700 at daylight (the circles) compared with the theoretical values (the squares). The further a square is removed from the corresponding square, the greater the color difference between the camera and reality. The further away a square or circle lies from the center, the more saturated ("brighter") is the color. The Nikon D700 delivers saturated RAW files (between 106 and 115%), with an average Delta E94 of 5,8 almost just as good as the color accuracy of the Canon 5D MK2. |
|||||
Color accuracy @ tungsten light |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Using auto whitebalance in tungsten light will, especially for the jpg files, yield images with a clear color cast, as you will see in the above shown measurement data for color accuracy in tungsten light (for 100 ISO jpg file). A sample portrait image is included in the Nikon D700 review. The color accuracy of RAW files taken in tungsten light are much better |
|||||











