Nikonbanner

The best lens for.... Nikon camera's

Lens advice
Starters

Starters

Lens advice
Amateurs

Amateurs

Lens advice
High End Amateurs

High End Amateurs

Lens advice
FX Amateurs

FX Amateurs

Review Nikon AF-P 70–300mm f/4.5-5.6E ED

0
0
0
s2smodern

Buy a Nikon AF-P 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 ED VR if you want to get sharp telephoto shots with an attractively priced zoom lens as a sports, nature or travel photographer. This lens has fast AF and good image stabilization with the VR mode SPORT. The light (for a camera with a full-frame sensor), weather-resistant construction makes it a pleasure to take this lens with you wherever you go.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-S FISHEYE 8-15mm @ DX

0
0
0
s2smodern

The AF-S Fisheye Nikkor 8-15mm f/3.5-4.5E ED is a fisheye lens from Nikon for full-frame FX cameras and Nikon's DX cameras with a crop sensor. The lens is versatile and offers outstanding image quality.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-S 28mm f/1.4E ED @ FX

0
0
0
s2smodern

The Nikon AF-S 28mm f/1.4E ED fills the gap between the Nikon 24mm f/1.4 G and the Nikon 35mm f/1.4 G. It is a completely newly designed lens, which combines a beautiful bokeh at full aperture with outstanding performance.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-P DX 10-20mm VR

0
0
0
s2smodern

The Nikon AF-P DX10-20mm F/4.5-5.6G VR is an affordable alternative to the almost twice as expensive Nikon AF-S DX 10-24MM F/3.5-4.5G ED. The new 10-20mm is also lighter and smaller. The NIKKOR 10-20mm F/4.5-5.6G VR is therefore an ideal budget lens and a nice wide angle as well.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-S FISHEYE 8-15mm @ FX

0
0
0
s2smodern

The new AF-S Fisheye Nikkor 8-15mm f/3.5-4.5E ED is a fisheye lens with which you can zoom. In general, you buy a fisheye lens to be able to get as much in frame as possible. Why would you zoom with it? The reason is simple: because you can then switch between frame-filling and circular fisheye. The AF-S Fisheye Nikkor 8-15mm is an all-in-one fisheye that performs outstandingly on both FX and DX.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E @ DX

0
0
0
s2smodern

Nikon spent eight years on the AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR, and they made good use of that time. The previous model was already good, but the new one is better. The sharpness is higher and more evenly spread across the whole image. You see that not only on a full-frame camera, but also on a DX-camera like the D500 or D7200.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E @ FX

0
0
0
s2smodern

The new AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR is the third generation 70-200mm zoom with image stabilization. The previous lens was already very good, but is currently 8 years old. The new AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8 shows that lenses can always improve.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon PC 19mm f/4E ED tilt/shift

0
0
0
s2smodern

Nikon is one of the few camera brands that builds an extensive series of lenses with which you can shift the focal surface and correct the perspective. That series was expanded in October 2016 on the wide-angle side with the PC NIKKOR 19mm F/4E ED. A lens with a list price just under 4,000 euros, which was under development for a long time and which is another step forward in the area of image quality.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-S 105mm f/1.4E ED @ D810

0
0
0
s2smodern

The Nikon AF-S 105mm f/1.4E ED on a Nikon D810 delivers, we will tell you up front, the highest image quality of nearly all of the (hundreds of) lenses that we have reviewed. A camera with a big sensor with high pixel density, like the Nikon D810, is merciless when it comes to testing image quality. Anyone switching to a camera with an FX sensor and high resolution will find out that the resolution of your old lens, certainly at full aperture and in the corners, is not as sharp as you had always thought. If you are still using a lens from the analogue era, then the chance of ghosts and flare is much greater than with modern lenses. The Nikon AF-S 105mm f/1.4E ED shines from full aperture, with high sharpness, a beautiful bokeh and remarkably few lens errors. A dream lens for professional fashion, portrait or wedding photographers. 

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-S 500mm f/4E FL ED @ DX

0
0
0
s2smodern

For some people, even a 500mm telephoto lens on a camera with an FX sensor is not enough. Couple a bright f/4 telephoto lens to a camera with a DX sensor, like the D7200 for the highest possible resolution or the D500 for action, and you have a field of view that corresponds with an 800mm telephoto lens on a camera with an FX sensor, while you still benefit from the high brightness. And for many telephoto lens shots, the extra focal depth in comparison with an 800mm on FX is a plus point if you are capturing a fast-moving subject in a photo. The Nikon AF-S 500mm f/4E FL ED is equipped with the newest lens technologies: nano-coating, two fluorite elements, multiple vibration reduction and an electromagnetically driven aperture. We tried this super-telephoto on a Nikon D7200 and a D500 DX / APS-C body.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-P 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6G DX VR

0
0
0
s2smodern

Kit lenses, like the Nikon AF-P 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6G DX VR, are practically always sold together with a camera body. They are then extremely attractively priced, and they make a good start for learning photography with an SLR camera. If you also want to film with an SLR camera, and photographers increasingly want to do that, then in many cases you find out that the AF motor of your lens is not quiet enough. You hear in the recordings when the camera is focusing.
That is why Nikon has released two 18-55 mm DX zoom lenses with a very quiet AF motor, compact design and a zoom range from wide-angle to standard. The only way the two lenses differ from each other is that the AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55 mm f/3.5–5.6G VR is equipped with built-in image stabilization (vibration reduction: VR) and the AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6G is not. The list price of the version with image stabilization, which this review is about, is 50 euros more expensive and a few grams heavier than the version without image stabilization, the review for which we will publish shortly. Our advice: buy the version with VR.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-S 600mm f/4E ED-IF II @ DX

0
0
0
s2smodern
Medium-sized, big, bigger, biggest: Nikon has four full-frame super-telephotos for the professional market: a 400 mm, a 500, a 600 and a (rare) 800 mm. Each one a big, heavy lens on which no concessions have been made on quality. They are therefore also all expensive lenses that will not be purchased by amateurs very often. This 600 mm f/4 ED-IF VR is available (webshop) for € 12,999. Aside from focal length, it does not differ much from the 500 mm (which we reviewed previously), but it is even bigger, heavier and more expensive. Is it worth it to put this expensive full-frame lens on an APS-C body? We tried it out with a D7200, and we think so. Read why...
0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-S 600 mm f/4E FL ED VR @ FX

0
0
0
s2smodern

Medium-big, big, bigger, biggest: Nikon has recently brought four super-telephotos for professionals to market: a 400 mm f/2.8E, a 500 mm f/4E , the 600 mm f/4E that we are discussing now and a (rare) 800 mm f/5.6E. Each and every one big, heavy lenses, where no concessions are made on quality. They’re therefore all expensive lenses, that will not be purchased very often by amateurs. The Nikon AF-S 600 mm f/4E FL ED VR is available for € 12,999. What could be more fun that heading out with a monster like this? Except in focal length, it does not differ much from the 500 mm (which we reviewed previously). It has a longer focal length, the same brightness, but is also bigger, heavier and even more expensive. Is it worth the difference in price?

Nikon AF-S 600 mm f/4E FL ED VR: Optical heavyweight

378096 high

First of all, the field of view. How much more telephoto do you get when you go on a full-frame camera from 500 mm to 600 mm or even 800 mm focal length? We calculated it in field of view (longest) side at a distance of 50 meters:

  • 500 mm 360 cm
  • 600 mm 300 cm
  • 800 mm 225 cm

Going from 500 to 600 mm at a distance of 50 meters thus gains you 60 cm field of view. That costs you an extra € 2000. If you choose the 800 mm, then you’ve spent 7000 euros for that 75 cm field of view! For many photographers, the 500 mm f/4E—as needed supplemented with a teleconverter—will be the most attractive choice as far as the price-to-quality ratio is concerned. It would not surprise me if the 800 mm is not often sold. Although, to our surprise, there are Dutch webshops that can deliver all three out of inventory. So... apparently that aren’t that exclusive.

DSC 3722

Build

The 600 mm lens looks different from the 500 mm: the front lens is larger, and the front extends conically, like a kind of midwinter horn. The number of lens elements and groups is identical; it is simply the same design as the 500 mm, except that the diameter of the lens elements is greater. The dimensions are 432x166 mm (for the 500 mm, that is 387x140), and it weighs 3810 grams (3090 g). Filters fit in the back, in a removable filter holder. A polarized filter that you can turn with a gear while it is in the lens fits in there as well. Because you often have trouble with haze when using extreme telephoto lenses, a polarized filter like that is often a solution for landscape and wildlife photography.

Screwed onto the lens (with real Philips-head screws!), there are two sturdy strap eyes. It’s smart to carry a camera on which such a heavy lens is mounted by the lens and not by the body. Professional camera bodies are strong, but, if possible, it’s better not to hang 4 kg on them. Of course there is a sturdy tripod collar and a connection for a cable lock. Not always unnecessary. A professional photographer told me the horror story about having a D4-plus 600 mm stolen in a stadium, a set worth a good 20,000 euros. Of course there is also a large carbon lens hood in the standard package; you can store it backwards on the lens. Over that fits a padded nylon cover that protects the front of the lens and that you quickly and easily put on and take off. This extreme telephoto lens, just like the 400 mm f/4E and the 500mm f/4E, is delivered in a sturdy matching case.

Specifications
Nikon AF-S 600 mm f/4E FL ED VR
Image Stabilization:+
lenses/ groups:10 / 7
length x diameter:432 / 166
filter size:52
Weight:3810
Lens hood:+
 DSC5821

Controls

The controls of the 600 mm are identical to those of the 500 mm; you can interchange the manuals. There are five switches on the lens. Next to the usual buttons –for this price class—you will also find two remarkable features (sound off and AF memory). First of all, there is of course the AF/MF switch. Next to the MF mode, there are two AF modes, with one of which you have to turn the focus ring further before anything happens. This prevents turning “by accident.” You can always “turn through automatic” with the focus ring. With the focus limit switch, you can limit the focus range to 8 meters and beyond. This prevents the much-feared wandering when focusing. With the AF function button, you can lock in the AF, or switch to a preset distance (memory). With another button, you can turn the beep that is emitted during focusing on or off, so that they birds are not chased off when the camera beeps to indicate that it is focused. You can see the set distance on a window. The aperture can only be set via the camera body; there is no separate aperture ring. That naturally also has to do with the electromagnetic aperture motor. Everything happens “by wire.” The shortest setting distance is 4.4 meters.

Vibration reduction is no idle luxury with a lens of this size. Without that, sharp shots by hand would hardly be possible. Nikon claims an improvement of 4 stops. We did not check that measurement. The VR switch has an “off” setting, a “normal” setting and a “sport” setting. The sport mode is for subjects with a lot of moving action, where you also move the camera, and it is especially intended for continuous shooting. Because you use a short shutter time for sport shots, the image stabilization when taking an action shot can lead to a less-sharp picture. The image stabilization in the Sport mode therefore only works for taking the picture, so that you get both a quiet viewfinder image and the sharpest possible shot. The VR works in both normal and sport mode when tracking the subject (“panning”) as well: it then only corrects perpendicular to the direction of the panning. The “off” mode is recommended for working from a tripod.

Auto focus is lightning fast and spot on. The repeatability of the AF is less than 5% (measured with Imatest), which is very good given the focal depth of this telephoto lens.

Sport and nature

This lens has two target audiences, Sport and Nature photographers. For nature and bird photography, haziness and atmospheric vibrations quickly play a part. Heading out early works best. For bird photography, you can never have too much telephoto, since the subject is often only a decimeter in size! For large mammals (safari!), a 600 mm is often too long. For a lot of sport photography, a long telephoto is indispensable. But too much is sometimes a pain. For football, for example, you want both the player and the ball in one frame. That often works better with a bit larger field of view and cropping afterwards. For tennis and indoor sports, you’re better off with a 200 mm than a 600. But if you want to capture the concentration of Daphne Schippers at the start of her Olympic race, then you never have enough telephoto. In addition, with many sports, you cannot get that close to the athletes, or that is simply too dangerous (auto sports!). Professional photographers often use a 1.4 or 2.0 extender on their 500 or 600 mm. Then the auto focus only works if you start with a bright lens, and this top model meets that condition. Do not automatically choose the shortest shutter time for sports photography! A limited amount of motion blur amplifies the suggestion of speed, and you can also stop down a bit more. The extra focal depth that you get is often needed!

DSC 3463 x2
The field of view of the moon (and the sun, which is the same size) is about half a degree. The field of view (longest side) of the 600mm on full-frame is three and a half degrees. For a frame-filling photo of the moon, you need more than a 600 mm. Crop, or use an extender. Tip: do not use a long shutter time, since the moon moves!

Competitors

Actually, this lens has no competitors. The heavy telephoto models from that other big Japanese manufacturer of SLRs do not fit on a Nikon camera, but we still want to test those in time. Sigma has a fixed-focal length 500 mm for a good deal less money, but that is an older lens design, and it probably doesn’t match the optical quality of this Nikon. There are various zoom lenses with 500 mm as the maximum range, at a fraction of what this 600 mm costs. Those are not as bright, are rather disappointing in terms of image quality in the corners, and they cannot really stand up to the rough daily practice of the professional photographer. The only serious competitor is the Nikon 500 mm f/4E; for the price difference, you can buy a good full-frame body as well!

It is a legitimate question: if you are prepared and able to put down more than 10,000 euros for a lens, wouldn’t you rather have a 600 mm than a 500 for 2000 euros extra? If you are a bird or nature photographer, the answer is probably yes. For sports photography, we don’t know yet: in that branch of photography, the enormous size of this 600 mm can be a handicap.

Distortion, vignetting, flare and chromatic aberration

Lens flaws like vignetting, distortion, flare and chromatic aberration are only measurable in the laboratory with some effort. There is vignetting of half a stop at full aperture, and half of one percent of pincushion-shaped distortion. Lateral chromatic aberration (0.3 pixels in unedited RAW files) is kept limited. So... exceptionally good.

Sharpness

FFJPGREZZ

The maximum sharpness of the Nikon 400 mm f/2.8, 500 mm f4 and 600mm f/4 differ little from each other. All three are the absolute top lenses with fantastic resolution that many lenses with a much shorter focal length cannot even dream about. Above is the data for the 600 mm. In all cases, the center sharpness in the measurements is higher than that in the corners, but it is not a difference that you see in practice shots. Sharpening has made the resolution of the in-camera JPEGs even better in comparison with the unsharpened RAW files. With careful sharpening of the RAW files, even better scores are possible.

Reviews


Conclusion Nikon AF-S 600 mm f/4E FL ED VR review with D810

Use the Lens Comparison or look in our overview of reviewed lenses in order to compare this lens with other lenses.

Support CameraStuffReview with a purchase @ Amazon

WYSIWYG score: This table shows the performance of this lens if you save the files in the camera as jpg, where you have applied all available in-camera lens corrections. This score gives you for this lens/test camera combination: "What you see is what you get".


Focal Length
mm @ FF
Total score
Resolution
lat. C.A.
Vignetting
Distortion
AF accur.
AF speed

600
600
8.9
8.4
9.6
8.7
8.1
9
8
Pure RAW score: This table shows the performance of this lens if the file is stored in the camera as a RAW file. This score approaches the intrinsic quality of the combination of lens and test camera. If you make use of Photoshop, Lightroom or SilkyPix for converting RAW files, then the RAW scores are equal to the jpg scores.


Focal Length
mm @ FF
Total score
Resolution
lat. C.A.
Vignetting
Distortion
AF accur.
AF speed

600
600
9.3
9.2
9.7
9.6
8.2
9
8

Pros

  • Flawless build quality
  • Unmatched optical performance
  • Fast and accurate AF
  • Handy features: Sports VR, AF memory & "sound off" switch

Cons

  • Not more than it’s worth, but a great deal of money
  • Big and heavy

This Nikon AF-S 600 mm f/4E FL ED VR is the best for sale in the extreme telephoto range. That applies for the build quality and for the image quality. Various handy dedicated features, like Sports VR, AF memory button and "sound off" switch are distinctive characteristics that you will find on few other lenses. We really didn’t find any minus points. High quality naturally comes at a price. Thirteen thousand euros is a great deal of money. Is that more than the lens is worth? Not for those who earn money with it. Anyone who spends 3 weeks in the Himalayas waiting for a rare snow leopard will consider himself lucky afterward for having chosen the 600 mm. If the snow leopard appears...  

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-S 500 mm f/4E FL ED @ FX

0
0
0
s2smodern

To be honest: when I get to test the umpteenth 18-55 mm kit lens, it takes effort to get enthusiastic about it. It’s a whole different thing when the Nikon importer gives you the opportunity to try out one of their professional telephoto lenses. The Nikon 500 mm AF-S f/4E FL ED. This is a monster of a lens. It weighs more than 3 kilos and is equipped with the newest lens technologies: nano coating, two fluorite elements, multiple vibration reduction and an electromagnetically driven aperture.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Review Nikon AF-P 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6G DX

0
0
0
s2smodern

Never before in a review of a lens with a high price-to-quality ratio have we made the recommendation to buy a different lens. There has to be a first time. And that is now. The Nikon AF-P 18-55 mm f/3.5 -5.6G DX is a kit lens that you can get for an attractive price with a Nikon 3300, D5300 or D5500. In comparison with the 18-55 mm kit lens that is sold with older Nikon DX cameras, the Nikon AF-P 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6G DX is better in the sense that it is fitted with a stepper motor, so that the auto focus is faster—both with phase detection (photography) and with contrast detection (video).
For video, an advantage of this new AF motor that is perhaps more important is that focusing is more fluid and that the AF motor is quieter, so that you do not hear it in your video recordings. The Nikon AF-P DX 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6G looks, as far as specifications are concerned, looks a great deal like the Nikon AF-P DX 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6G VR. The latter is 10 grams heavier, has built-in image stabilization and is therefore 50 euros more expensive. When testing the two kit lenses, we were not able to discover any optical quality differences. Not hard to guess which recommendation we’re going to give in the conclusion...

0
0
0
s2smodern