From our test of the first version of the Panasonic 20 mm 1.7, released with the start of the micro-43 system in 2009, this appeared to be a surprisingly small and optically very good lens. Still, a while ago there appeared a second version of this venerable lens, which we have now tested. Are there differences between the two versions?The Panasonic 20 mm 1.7 II is in conjunction with a Panasonic GM1 almost as small as a compact camera. We tested the Panasonic 20 mm II on a Panasonic GX7. If you use the electronic shutter, then the Panasonic GX7 at full aperture is a completely silent rangefinder camera. At a smaller aperture, you can hear a tiny click when you take a picture.
Panasonic 20mm 1.7 ASPH LUMIX G 20 mm II review @ Panasonic GX7
Panasonic 20 mm f/1.7 is very attractive for street photography, wedding photography or other occasions where you want to be as unobtrusive as possible as a photographer. And it’s an ideal travel companion for your holidays.
Construction and Auto focus
This compact lens is solidly built and beautifully finished despite its low weight. There are minor differences in appearance between the Panasonic 20 mm 1.7 (left) and the Panasonic 20 mm f1/7 II (right). The first version of the lens had a gray body with black focusing ring. Version two has a black body. Also, the black plastic on the front reflects more on the new lens than on the old model. The second version appears, due to the materials chosen, somewhat more sophisticated.
In the image on the right, you can see how compact the combination of the Panasonic GX7 with this pancake lens is. The drive of the auto focus is a "drive by wire" system, meaning you don’t feel any mechanical resistance when focusing manually. The focus ring also keeps turning if you've reached 20 cm or infinity. That takes some getting used to. Auto focus of the Panasonic 20 mm 1.7 I on a Panasonic GX7 happens quickly and accurately. However, recent models of Panasonic lenses, such as the Panasonic 14-140 mm or the Panasonic 12-32 mm, focus a bit faster than the Panasonic 20 mm f/1.7.
This lens is so compact; there is no room for image stabilization. But considering the focal length and the brightness of this lens, image stabilization will seldom be missed.
With the in-camera image stabilization of the Panasonic GX7, we saw a modest profit of 1 to 2 stops.
A large aperture is not only attractive for a beautiful background blur, it also makes it possible to shoot in the dark longer without motion blur or using a flash.
Only at maximum aperture does this lens suffer from vignetting. That's not unique to this lens, with bright lenses on a camera with a full frame sensor it’s also common. Because this is one of the few micro-43 lenses with a brightness under f/2, many photographers will choose a large aperture because of the beautiful background blur. Fortunately, vignetting is easy to correct afterwards with software if it’s a problem.
The distortion of this lens is for both the RAW files (at most RAW converters) and jpg files automatically corrected. The end result is very good.
If you make a portrait on the street with a 50 mm lens on an SLR camera, then the subject might be intimidated by quite a big camera at a relatively short distance. With this little pancake lens, you have no problems with that.
The background blur of the Panasonic 20 mm delivers a nice bokeh. It isn’t yet entirely comparable to the bokeh of a bright lens on a camera with a full frame sensor, but almost certainly good enough for 99.9% of the photographers who want to play with depth of field. At maximum aperture the bokeh de to vignetting from round in the center to a cat's eye in the corners, as you can clearly see in the picture below.
Click (2x) on the image at right for a larger version of a practice shot.
It seems that version 2 of the Panasonic 20 mm 1.7 is less sensitive to flare than the first version. We found it difficult to detect that difference. When testing the Panasonic 20 mm 1.7 v2 in the testing lab under extreme conditions, we occasionally encountered flare (such as in the sample shown here). In the pictures taken in practice that we made during the day and even in most night shots, we did not run into that.
If you’re planning to do night photography with this lens where there are a lot of street lights, then you will occasionally encounter flare. That also applies to many other lenses.
We used the space on the right to show the lens design. For the connoisseurs among us: 7 lens elements, including two aspherical, in 5 groups.
In order to compareMTF50 results for this lens with MTF values for lenses tested oncameras with anAPS-C or full frame sensor, we set the micro-43 test camera to a 2: 3ratio. In other words: we testedthis lenswith a resolution of14megapixels (2:3 ratio) instead of16megapixels (4:3 ratio). Using the native 4:3 aspect ratio will yield slightly higher MTF values.
The sharpness of the Panasonic 20 mm 1.7 II in the center is very high; this was the case for both our practice shots and our measurements. The Panasonic GX7 test camera is probably the reason that we measured a higher resolution for version 2 than in our testing of version 1 (with a Panasonic GH2 camera).
From the measurements, it appears the resolution outer corners always lags relative to the center. In practice that is not noticeable, because the resolution in the outer corners up to aperture 4 remains well over 1000 LW/PH.
According to Panasonic, the use of 2 aspherical lenses ensures that chromatic aberration is minimized. In addition, both the RAW files (at most RAW converters) and the jpg files are automatically corrected for chromatic aberration.
In our practice shots, we have encountered no chromatic aberration with the Panasonic 20 mm 1.7, and the measurement values for chromatic aberration are also very low.
Conclusion Panasonic 20 mm 1.7 ASPH LUMIX G II review with Panasonic GX7
Support CameraStuffReview with a purchase @ Amazon
WYSIWYG score: This table shows the performance of this lens when you save the files in the camera as jpg, including all in-camera lens corrections (distortion, chromatic aberration). This score gives you for this lens/test camera combination: "What you see is what you get".
Pure RAW score: This table shows the performance of this lens when the file is stored in the camera as a RAW file. This score approaches the intrinsic quality of the combination of lens and test camera. If you make use of Photoshop, Lightroom or SilkyPix for converting RAW files, then the RAW scores for chromatic aberration and distortion are the same as the jpg scores.
Low chromatic aberration and distortion
Compact design and lightweight
Solid construction and nice finish
Vignetting at full aperture
Manual focusing without resistance
Our conclusion about the Panasonic 20 mm f/1.7 v2 is unchanged from the first version. The Panasonic 20 mm 1.7, whether you're talking about version 1 or 2, is a nice lens without major disadvantages. It is an attractively priced, bright, compact and light pancake with very good optical performance. The Panasonic GX7 test camera is probably the reason we measured a higher resolution for version 2 in our testing than for version 1 (with a Panasonic GH2 camera). From the measurements, the resolution in the outer corners always lags behind compared to the very high resolution in the center. In practice, this isn’t noticeable. Practice shots are rich in contrast, sharp and have a nice bokeh. At maximum aperture, the vignetting is correctable with software, in those situations where the disturbance is visible.
This micro-43 standard lens is an ideal partner for a Panasonic GM1 or a Panasonic GX7. If you prefer a zoom lens with the same dimensions, then the 20 mm 1.7 II has a competitor in the Panasonic 12-32 mm, which we recently tested.
As good as this micro-43 lens is, it comes out even better when you compare it to all other lenses with an equivalent field of view, tested on SLR cameras with an APS-C or full frame sensor. We have so far tested 75 lenses with virtually the same field of view as the Panasonic 20 mm f/1.7 on various cameras with a micro-43, APS-C or full frame sensor. The Panasonic 20 mm 1.7 image quality falls among the 15 best lenses for micro-43, APS-C and full frame. When you realize that some lenses have been tested on a camera with 36 megapixels, while this test is performed on a 16 megapixel camera, then it’s clear that the Panasonic 20 mm f/1.7 II in terms of value for money and ease of use is a very attractive offer.
Author: Ivo Freriks
With Camera Review Stuff I hope to make a modest contribution to the pleasure that you get from photography. By testing cameras and lenses in the same way, evluating the results and weighing up the pros and cons, I hope to help you find the right camera or lens.
Excellent review. Many Thanks!<br />Specially for comparing it with the previous 20mm f/1.7.<br /><br />Also the shots you took from this lens are very good example to demonstrate different applications of this lens.<br /><br />However, I didn't...
Excellent review. Many Thanks!<br />Specially for comparing it with the previous 20mm f/1.7.<br /><br />Also the shots you took from this lens are very good example to demonstrate different applications of this lens.<br /><br />However, I didn't knew the in-camera corrections that the camera applies also responded in Lightroom. Is it a standard for all the in-body corrected lenses?
Hi Naveed,<br /><br />It is a standard for all in-body corrected lenses by several companies. The RAW files of several companies (Olympus, Panasonic, Fuji, Samsung) are corrected for several lens aberrations, but the corrected parameters...
Hi Naveed,<br /><br />It is a standard for all in-body corrected lenses by several companies. The RAW files of several companies (Olympus, Panasonic, Fuji, Samsung) are corrected for several lens aberrations, but the corrected parameters differ.<br /><br />That's why, for example, there are no lens-correction profiles in Lightroom / Photoshop for correction of RAW files shot with Panasonic or Olympus lenses.<br /><br />regards,<br /><br />Ivo