Review Canon 100 mm 2.0 (C APS-C)

In 1991, the Canon 100 mm, fully named Canon 100 mm 2.0 USM, was put on the market, and has always been somewhat snowed under by the nearly as big but cheaper Canon 85 mm 1.8. A 100 mm is at an APS-C reflex camera a very nice addition to the Canon 18-55 mm kit lens or the fast Canon 17-55 mm. A 100 mm lens has a big advantage over a 85 mm lens. Namely, if you change from the APS-C format to full frame, you immediately have the nearly perfect portrait lens in case of a 100 mm lens. Remember that lenses such as the Canon 100 mm IS Macro, Sigma 105 mm OS Macro and Tokina 100 mm Macro are tremendous rivals of the Canon 100 mm though.

APS-C_Canon_100_mm_praktijk_beeldhoek
APS-C Canon_100_mm_praktijk_overstraling

Construction

 

The lens is made of a high quality type of plastic and the fitting is made of metal. The focus ring is smooth and without play. The filter size is, despite the high speed, only 58 mm, and the filter does not turn when focusing. The size of this lens does not change during focusing. The lens is delivered without lens hood. The autofocus is of the HSM type. Focusing is fast and nearly silent with a Canon 600D. Focusing only takes 0.21 seconds from 15 meters to 1.5 meters. Even in low light, the camera does not hunt.

Canon_100_mm_20_bouw

Vignetting

 

Vignetting amounts to only 0.25 stops at full aperture, which is a very low value.

vignet

Distortion

 
The distortion, expressed as a percentage, is extremely low at 0.14%, and will never be visible in practice. jpgdistort

Flare

 

The lens suffers from flare at an open light source. However, and this is very positive, the image remains free from ghosting at backlight.

APS-C_Canon_100_mm_overstraling

Resolution

 

The resolution, expressed in lines/ sensor height, is a bit disappointing at all apertures. Stopping down to f/4.0 improves the sharpnes a lot. ‘Real photo’s’ show that sharpnes is better than sharpnes of many consumer zoom lenses. If you compare the Canon 100 mm with the Sigma 85 mm, you will see that both lenses should be stopped down about 2 stops in order to achieve good performance.

jpgresolutie

Chromatic aberration

 

Chromatic aberration is a bit high at f/2.8 and should be combated software-wise.

jpgca

Bokeh

The detail shots are of the left glass and the right bottle.

The image comes across very ‘busy’ in the blurred parts. You can see that the blurred, round shapes are marred by circular lines. Bokeh is not that nice.

Bo_APS_100_mm_2_1
Bo_APS_100_mm_2_2
Canon EF 100 mm 2.0 USM @f/2.0
Bo_APS_100_mm_2_3
Canon EF 100 mm 2.0 USM @f/2.0
Bo_APS_100__8_1
@f/8.0
Bo_APS_100__8_2
@f/8.0

Conclusion

Use the Lens Comparison or look in our list of reviewed lenses to compare this lens with other lenses.

WYSIWYG score: More and more often when designing a lens, distortion, color separation and vignetting are consciously not optimally corrected. As a result, fewer expensive lens elements or exotic glass types need to be used, which ultimately results in a more attractive selling price. The lens manufacturer relies on automatic correction of these characteristics in the camera or in photo editing software. The “jpg-score” gives you for a lens/test camera combination, “What you see is what you get” when all available lens corrections are applied in the camera. 

{loadmodule mod_custom, LensConclusion} {insertgrid ID = 308}

Pure RAW score: With more expensive lenses, a manufacturer often goes to great lengths in the lens design to prevent lens errors. Neither costs nor effort are spared, which can be recognized by the use of exotic types of glass and many lens elements. The “RAW score” approximates the intrinsic quality of the combination of lens and test camera, with CameraStuffReview attempting to bypass any automatic lens corrections of RAW files. If you use lens correction profiles in Photoshop or Lightroom to convert RAW files, the RAW scores for distortion, vignetting and chromatic aberration will be higher or equal to the corresponding jpg scores.

{loadmodule mod_custom, LensConclusion} {insertgrid ID = 309}

Pro

  • Very low vignetting
  • Very low distortion
  • No ghosting at backlight
  • Fast autofocus
  • Compactly built

Con

  • Chromatic aberration a little on the high side
  • Lack of sharpnes
  • Not a nice bokeh
  • Flare at backlight

The Canon 100 mm in combination with an APS-C reflex camera lacks of sharpnes. On the other hand, vignetting is low and there is almost no distortion. Despite the high speed, the  Canon 100 mm is built compactly. The bokeh of the Canon 100 mm IS Macro, Sigma 105 mm OS Macro and Tokina 100 mm Macro is nicer. For the lovers of ‘primes’ the Canon 100 mm can be usefull and is a nice addition to the Canon 17-55 mm.

 {insertgrid ID = 600}

 

Close Menu