Review Sigma 105 mm/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro (C APS-C)

0
0
0
s2smodern

The Sigma 105 mm 2.8 OS Macro has entered the market in the summer of 2011. A big difference with the previous model is the built-in image stabilization. The focal length of 105 mm is sometimes a bit tight on a full-frame camera in macro photography; you are often working in your own shadows then. In this regard, a 150 mm or a 180 mm macro is preferred. A focal length of 105 mm is very useful as a portrait lens in many cases. And if you enjoy working with primes, the Sigma 105 mm 2.8 Macro OS is a logical step after a 50 mm standard lens. The actual price at the moment is much lower than the suggested retail price at its introduction, which makes this Sigma macro lens even more attractive.

Sigma macro lens review

Construction and Autofocus

The lens is made of a high-quality type of plastic, and the mount is made of metal. Sigma fortunately does not use the delicate hammered motif anymore. The focus ring turns completely free of play and with just the right friction. The stroke is about 180 degrees. The whole feels very solid and the lens is supplied with two large lens hoods: one to use with a full-frame camera and one to use with an APS-C camera. The AF is driven by a USM motor.
Focusing with a Canon 5D MK2 is not very quick; from 15 meters to 1.5 meters in 0.32 seconds. That is a fraction more than the USM-powered Canon 100 mm 2.8 IS Macro. Focusing makes some noise and in low contrast, the AF sometimes shows seeking behavior.
Specifications
Sigma 105 mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro
Image Stabilization:+
lenses/ groups:16/11
length x diameter:126 / 78
filter size:62
Weight:725
Lens hood:+

Sigma-105mm-macro

Image stabilization

 
The image stabilization provides a gain of approximately 3 ½ stops. The lens becomes so much more versatile because of that. At a focal distance of about 33 cm, the effectiveness is approximately 1 stop. A similar phenomenon also occurs with the Canon 100 mm 2.8 IS Macro. The image stabilization of the Sigma makes an occasional grunting sound, long after the image was taken too.
Sigma lens review

Vignetting Sigma 105 mm macro

 
Vignetting, expressed in stops, is very low at all apertures. Even at full aperture you will not have to take it into account in practice. Quite an accomplishment for a full-frame lens.
vignet-Sigma-105mm-macro650d

Distortion Sigma 105mm macro

The distortion is extremely low, namely -0.12%. This will never be visible or distracting in practice.

distortion-Sigma-105mm-macro650d

Sigma-105mm-macro-sample-image

Bokeh

As you can see in the Sigma 105mm macro sample image above, blurred elements in the foreground or background are common and thus important in macro photos. We see that the Sigma displays that blur very nicely woolly.

Sigma 105 2.8 test, Sigma 105 2.8 lens, portretlens test, macrolens
Sigma 105 mm  bokeh 2
f/2.8
Sigma 105 mm  bokeh 3
f/2.8

Flare

In backlight, the flare is not so bad; this is less than with the Canon 100 mm 2.8 IS Macro.

Resolution Sigma 105 mm macro

 

The resolution, expressed in lines/sensor height, exhibits good values. Stopping down only once is needed to achieve a high peak. The difference between the center and corners is very small which is advantageous. The resolution at f/11.0 is hardly less than at f/8.0. With macro, it is sometimes necessary to stop down in order to get enough depth of field. A lens that draws sharply.

resolution-Sigma-105mm-macro650d
Sigma 105 mm  muur hoek
Sigma 105 mm/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro, coner f/5.6 
Sigma 105 mm  scherpte etc 7205
Sigma 105 mm/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro, center f/5.6

Chromatic aberration

 

The chromatic aberration is low and also in this area, the Sigma performs very well.

CA-Sigma-105mm-macro650d

Conclusion Sigma 105 mm/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro review

Sigma 105 mm macro  productfoto

 

See our overview of tested lenses or our overview of tested lenses with a Canon mount to compare the performances of this lens with other lenses.

ECWYSIWYG score: This table shows the performance of this lens if you store the files in the camera as jpg, where you have all available in-camera lens corrections applied. This score gives you for this lens/test camera combination: "What you see is what you get".
105
168
7.8
7.0
9.1
8.2
9.3
 
ECPure RAW score: This table shows the performance of this lens when the file is stored in the camera in RAW format. This score approaches the intrinsic quality of the combination of lens and test camera.
105
168
8.5
8.2
9.4
9.5
9.5

Pros

  • High resolution
  • Minor difference in resolution between the center and corners
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Very low distortion
  • Effective image stabilization at normal focal distance

Cons

  • Sensitive to flare
  • Tendency to hunt at low subject contrast
If you're looking for a lens with the highest image quality for a Canon APS-C camera at an attractive price, seek no further: the Sigma performs very well. For example, distortion and vignetting are low and, important in macro, the bokeh is beautiful. Two small remarks, after a long search. The autofocus sometimes searches in low contrast. And the resistance towards flare is less compared to the current Sigma Art lenses. The Sigma 105 mm 2.8 OS Macro is cheaper than the Canon 100 mm L 2.8 IS Macro. This one has a slightly higher chromatic aberration, is more sensitive to backlight and doesn't deliver a higher resolution.
Ivo Freriks
Author: Ivo Freriks
With Camera Review Stuff I hope to make a modest contribution to the pleasure that you get from photography. By testing cameras and lenses in the same way, evluating the results and weighing up the pros and cons, I hope to help you find the right camera or lens.

0
0
0
s2smodern

Comments (2)

  1. EDP

Hi,<br />I am about to decide either to buy a nikon 60mm micro or sigma 105mm. They will be mounted in a D7100 and I do really want to make a good investment instead of having to replace my purchase few months later.<br /><br />I would appreciate...

Hi,<br />I am about to decide either to buy a nikon 60mm micro or sigma 105mm. They will be mounted in a D7100 and I do really want to make a good investment instead of having to replace my purchase few months later.<br /><br />I would appreciate any comments that would be very helpful.<br /><br />Bests regards....

Read More
 
  1. Ivo    EDP

Hi EDP,<br /><br />We haven't tested the Nikon 60mm macro yet, so I can not say much about that lens. <br />Maby macro photographers prefer a larger focal length. This enables them to keep more distance from their subject. Not only for nature...

Hi EDP,<br /><br />We haven't tested the Nikon 60mm macro yet, so I can not say much about that lens. <br />Maby macro photographers prefer a larger focal length. This enables them to keep more distance from their subject. Not only for nature (you don't scare your butterflies), but you also will not block your light when you come so close.<br />The Sigma 105mm has built-in VR, which is a nice extra. And as you can see, it offers high image quality with a Nikon D7100.<br /><br />Best regards,<br /><br />Ivo

Read More
 

Leave your comments

Posting comment as a guest.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location